Skip to content

Stakeholder Map

Status: Draft
Source file: 01 Scoping/05-stakeholder-map.md
Sensitivity review: Completed

This map identifies stakeholder groups for later engagement. No primary research has been undertaken during Phase 1.

Stakeholder group Why they matter Information they can provide Recommended engagement method Perspective supported Priority
Existing hemp growers Practical experience with yields, costs, compliance, markets and production risk. Enterprise costs, production constraints, buyer relationships, failure points. Semi-structured interview in Phase 3. Producer, Supply Chain, Environment High
Potential growers Test adoption barriers and opportunity cost against current enterprises. Decision criteria, risk tolerance, required returns, machinery and labour constraints. Interviews or workshop in Phase 3. Producer, GBLC High
Mixed farmers Relevant comparator enterprises and rotation decisions. Alternative crop economics, soil and water constraints, adoption practicality. Interviews in Phase 3. Producer, Environment High
Grazing enterprises Major comparator land use in parts of the region. Opportunity cost, landscape outcomes, enterprise resilience. Interviews or targeted workshop. Producer, Environment Medium
Agronomists and farm advisers Translate regional conditions into production feasibility. Suitability, risks, input programs, variety and harvest issues. Expert interviews. Producer, Environment High
Hemp processors Critical test of market access and infrastructure. Intake capacity, quality specs, fees, minimum volumes, supply risk. Semi-structured interview and document request. Supply Chain, Producer High
Manufacturers Link processed hemp to end-use markets. Product specifications, demand stability, price sensitivity. Interview or written questions. Supply Chain Medium
Exporters Test export opportunities and requirements. Export volumes, certification, specifications, buyer demand and competition. Interview. Supply Chain Medium
Wholesalers and distributors Test domestic market depth and product movement. Sales channels, volume, pricing and margin structure. Interview. Supply Chain Medium
Food, fibre and building-material buyers Distinguish interest from actual demand. Purchase volumes, specifications, substitute products and price thresholds. Interview and document request. Supply Chain, Producer High
Seed suppliers Production feasibility depends on genetics and seed access. Variety availability, legal constraints, seed cost, performance claims. Interview and document review. Producer, Supply Chain Medium
Contractors and machinery providers Operational feasibility may depend on specialised services. Planting, harvesting, drying, storage and logistics capability. Interview. Producer Medium
Freight and logistics providers Freight can determine farm-gate viability. Transport costs, handling constraints, distances and minimum loads. Written estimate or interview. Producer, Supply Chain Medium
NSW DPI and Queensland DAF Relevant agronomic, regulatory and industry-development information. Licensing, trials, production guidance and regional fit. Expert interview and source review. Producer, Supply Chain, Environment High
DAFF, ABARES and ABS Government data for agriculture, trade and regional economics. Statistics and policy context. Secondary research; targeted clarification if required. Supply Chain, Producer, GBLC High
AgriFutures and CSIRO Research, industry studies and technical evidence. Agronomy, market and environmental evidence. Secondary research; expert interview if needed. All High
Local governments Regional development, land use and planning context. Economic-development priorities, infrastructure and regional data. Interview or document review. GBLC, Supply Chain Medium
Universities and researchers Independent review of agronomy, environmental and economic claims. Study interpretation, limitations, research gaps. Expert interview. Environment, Producer High
Environmental organisations Test environmental claims and risks. Biodiversity, water, landscape and restoration comparisons. Interview or workshop. Environment, GBLC Medium
Landcare members GBLC legitimacy and member value depend on member priorities. Appetite for involvement, concerns, education needs. Survey, meeting or workshop in Phase 3. GBLC, Environment High
Traditional Owners and Indigenous land managers Land and cultural considerations may affect project relevance and engagement. Land-use priorities, cultural values, partnership considerations. Respectful early engagement through appropriate channels. GBLC, Environment Medium
Financial institutions and insurers Finance and risk pricing affect adoption. Lending appetite, insurance constraints, risk perceptions. Interview. Producer, Supply Chain Low
Regulators and compliance officers Licensing and compliance risks must be current. Compliance obligations and enforcement issues. Written clarification or interview. Producer, Supply Chain, GBLC High

Stakeholder Blind Spots to Avoid

  • Consulting only advocates or existing industry participants.
  • Treating growers and processors as having the same interests.
  • Under-representing producers who decide not to grow hemp.
  • Overlooking contractors, freight providers and buyers who may determine practical viability.
  • Assuming Landcare member support without testing it.