Phase 2 Interim Case
This material is based on Phase 2 secondary research only. It does not make a final business-case recommendation and should not be read as a recommendation to promote, discourage or invest in industrial hemp.
Session Material
| Page | Use it for |
|---|---|
| Presentation | Unified slide-content and presenter-notes draft for the session. |
| Presentation Handout | Participant handout following the presentation flow. |
| SWOT Summary | Condensed strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. |
| Evidence and Gaps | Phase 2 evidence base, analysis chain and unresolved questions. |
| Potential GBLC Roles | Role options for Granite Borders Landcare. |
Downloads
| File | Use it for |
|---|---|
| [Presentation PDF](../../09 Outputs/Phase 2 Interim Case/phase-2-interim-case-presentation-draft.pdf) | View or share the slide deck as a fixed-format document. |
| [Presentation PowerPoint](../../09 Outputs/Phase 2 Interim Case/phase-2-interim-case-presentation-draft.pptx) | Open or present the editable PowerPoint deck. |
Primary Research Survey Drafts
The neutral survey drafts prepared during the interim case session have been moved into 3.1 Initial Primary Research, where they now sit with the current primary research planning material.
Phase 2 Interim Logic
The session follows this evidence chain:
| Step | Output |
|---|---|
| 1 | Phase 2 secondary research |
| 2 | Interim PESTLE analysis |
| 3 | Interim Porter's Five Forces analysis |
| 4 | Interim SWOT analysis |
| 5 | Evidence gaps |
| 6 | Phase 2 interim position |
| 7 | Potential GBLC roles |
The central interim position is that industrial hemp is lawful and plausible, but Phase 2 does not yet prove local commercial viability, local net environmental benefit or a promotional role for Granite Borders Landcare.
Source Register
The published source trail is maintained in the Source Register.