Industrial Hemp Environmental and Economic Assessment

Methodology

The project uses a decision-focused methodology. It prioritises relevance, practicality, evidence quality and decision usefulness over academic completeness.

The method began with a Granite Borders starting scope and has now been re-scoped to the New England Landcare Network member-organisation footprint before the next secondary research update.

Research Phases

PhasePurposeCurrent status
1. ScopingDefine the questions, scope, methodology, assumptions and information gaps.Complete; re-scoped to NELN member organisations
2. Secondary ResearchCollect and classify evidence from government, academic and industry sources.Underway
3. Primary ResearchCollect evidence through grower, processor, buyer, exporter and expert interviews.Not commenced
4. Strategic AnalysisApply PESTLE, Porter's Five Forces, SWOT and synthesis.Interim Phase 2 analysis only
5. Business CasePrepare the executive summary, findings, risks, opportunities and recommendations.Not commenced

Evidence Approach

PrinciplePractical meaning
Evidence before opinionPrefer measured data, published research, government statistics, market evidence and transaction evidence.
Challenge assumptionsDo not assume hemp is viable, sustainable, profitable, beneficial or unsuitable.
Compare against alternativesEnvironmental and economic claims must be tested against realistic regional land uses.
Identify trade-offsRecord benefits, costs, risks, limitations and uncertainties for major claims.
Keep decisions in viewPrioritise evidence that helps answer the business case questions.

Evidence Register Requirements

All significant claims should be traceable to evidence and classified by:

FieldWhy it is recorded
Source type and publication dateTo understand credibility and currency.
GeographyTo distinguish member-area, comparable and background evidence.
Product categoryTo avoid treating hemp as one market or one production system.
RelevanceTo show which decision question the evidence supports.
Evidence strength and confidenceTo separate strong findings from uncertain or preliminary claims.
Follow-up requiredTo identify what must be checked through later secondary or primary research.

Current Status

Phase 1 is complete and has been re-scoped. Phase 2 is approved and underway. Primary research and final business-case conclusions have not commenced.