Claim & Data Extracts
This pilot page records decision-relevant claims and data points extracted from priority sources. The working authority is 06 Evidence Register/source-claim-data-register.csv. The extracts below use page-level back-references so readers can see where each item has been used without turning the register into a sentence-by-sentence citation index.
For the source-level lookup page, see the Source Register.
S001 - NSW Hemp Industry
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S001-001 | Claim | NSW industrial hemp cultivation and supply operate through the NSW low-THC hemp licensing pathway. | Licence required | Supports the finding that lawful production is possible but compliance must be assessed for Tenterfield producers. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/05-business-case/phase-2-interim-case/evidence-and-gaps.md | Checked |
S003 - Growing Industrial Cannabis Or Hemp In Queensland
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S003-001 | Claim | Queensland industrial cannabis or hemp growers require a Biosecurity Queensland licence. | Licence required | Supports the finding that lawful production is possible in the historic Stanthorpe context but licensing is material. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/05-business-case/phase-2-interim-case/evidence-and-gaps.md | Checked |
| S003-002 | Claim | Queensland guidance prohibits CBD oil or other products from leaves or flowering heads under the industrial hemp pathway. | CBD/leaves/flowering heads prohibited under industrial hemp pathway | Supports excluding cannabinoid, flower, CBD and medicinal pathways unless formally re-scoped. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/06-evidence/product-pathway-register.md | Checked |
S024 - Australian Industrial Hemp Strategic RD&E Plan 2022-2027
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S024-001 | Claim | Australian industrial hemp is described as being in its infancy compared with Canada, China and the European Union. | Industry infancy comparison | Supports the emerging-industry framing but does not prove local demand or viability. | docs/02-secondary-research/international-industry-context.md; docs/02-secondary-research/economic-confidence-review.md; docs/04-analysis/phase-2-interim/synthesis.md | Context only |
| S024-002 | Claim | Industry development requires increased scale, suitable varieties, agronomy, mechanisation, processing efficiency and established long-term markets. | Scale; varieties; agronomy; mechanisation; processing; markets | Supports GBLC's evidence-building framing and the need for product-pathway validation rather than promotion. | docs/02-secondary-research/economic-confidence-review.md; docs/04-analysis/phase-2-interim/swot.md; docs/04-analysis/phase-2-interim/synthesis.md | Checked |
S035 - Industrial Hemp Variety Trials Final Report - Stanthorpe Queensland
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S035-001 | Claim | The Stanthorpe final report is a direct regional agronomic evidence lead covering 2022-23 and 2023-24 trials under different sowing times and fully organic management. | 2022-23 and 2023-24 trial seasons | Supports treating Stanthorpe as a high-priority direct evidence lead while retaining transferability and extraction caveats. | docs/02-secondary-research/regional-suitability.md; docs/05-business-case/phase-2-interim-case/evidence-and-gaps.md | Needs verification |
S052 - Hemp Industry New South Wales Licence Manual
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S052-001 | Data | NSW licence manual states a new hemp licence application can take up to four months depending on complexity and document/check timing. | Up to 4 months | Supports regulatory timing risk in producer economics and planting-window assessment. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/02-secondary-research/phase-2-summary-report.md | Checked |
| S052-002 | Claim | NSW licence manual records site suitability, planting notification, annual reporting, audit and non-compliant THC notification obligations. | Site; notification; reporting; audit obligations | Supports treating NSW compliance as an operating and time-burden issue, not just a licence fee. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/02-secondary-research/producer-economics.md | Checked |
S057 - Drugs Misuse Act 1986 Part 5B
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S057-001 | Claim | Queensland Part 5B facilitates controlled commercial production, processing, marketing and trade in industrial cannabis fibre and seed pathways. | Fibre and seed pathways | Supports lawful Queensland industrial hemp pathways while keeping medicinal or smoking pathways separate. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/02-secondary-research/phase-2-summary-report.md | Checked |
| S057-002 | Data | Queensland industrial cannabis plant threshold is not more than 1% THC in leaves and flowering heads; planting seed is linked to a 0.5% THC plant basis. | 1% THC crop threshold; 0.5% THC planting-seed basis | Supports seed-sourcing and crop-compliance risk controls for historic Stanthorpe producers. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/06-evidence/product-pathway-register.md | Checked |
S058 - Drugs Misuse Regulation 1987 Part 4
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S058-001 | Claim | Queensland Part 4 sets planting-seed verification, record keeping, planting notification and THC testing readiness obligations. | Planting notice within 14 days; THC testing readiness at least four weeks before intended harvest | Supports producer-compliance timing and record-keeping risk assessment. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/02-secondary-research/producer-economics.md | Checked |
| S058-002 | Data | Queensland monitoring costs can include inspector time, travel time and reasonable sample-analysis costs. | Monitoring; travel; sample analysis | Supports inclusion of variable compliance costs in Queensland producer budgets. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/02-secondary-research/producer-economics.md | Checked |
S059 - Best Management Practice Manual For Growing Harvesting And Storing Industrial Hemp In Australia
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S059-001 | Data | AgriFutures BMP manual reports just under 2,500 ha planted by more than 500 licence holders across Australia in 2022-23. | Just under 2,500 ha; more than 500 licence holders | Supports national industry-scale context but licence counts should not be treated as active production counts. | docs/02-secondary-research/international-industry-context.md; docs/02-secondary-research/economic-confidence-review.md | Context only |
| S059-002 | Claim | AgriFutures BMP manual provides national guidance on variety choice, sowing, soil, nutrition, irrigation, crop protection, harvest, storage, contracts and farmgate cost categories. | Agronomy and farmgate checklist categories | Supports using the manual as a national checklist, not proof of Granite Borders suitability or profitability. | docs/02-secondary-research/regional-suitability.md; docs/02-secondary-research/product-pathway-economic-rough-guide.md | Checked |
S061 - Stanthorpe Trial Site 2023-24 Results
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S061-001 | Claim | The 2023-24 Stanthorpe trial evaluated plant density, height, root depth, dry matter yield, grain yield, water-use efficiency and grain quality. | Trial indicators | Supports regional suitability screening and water-use efficiency as a priority indicator. | docs/02-secondary-research/regional-suitability.md; docs/02-secondary-research/environmental-evidence.md | Checked |
| S061-002 | Data | Stanthorpe trial summary records Excalibur as the highest grain-yielding variety and Ruby as the highest biomass-yielding variety in the reported season. | 1.22 t/ha grain; 7.5 t/ha biomass | Provides local yield signals but not farm economics or region-wide suitability. | docs/02-secondary-research/product-pathway-economic-rough-guide.md; docs/02-secondary-research/regional-suitability.md | Needs verification |
S069 - Food Standards Code Standard 1.4.4
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S069-001 | Data | Food Standards Code permits low-THC Cannabis sativa seeds as food or food ingredients only where seed conditions are met, including low THC, non-viable and hulled retail seed requirements. | 5 mg/kg total THC for seed | Supports the lawful seed-food pathway and prevents conflation with leaves, flowers, CBD or medicinal cannabis. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/02-secondary-research/market-demand.md; docs/06-evidence/product-pathway-register.md | Checked |
| S069-002 | Data | Food Standards Code sets product-specific total THC limits for seed oil, beverages and other seed-derived products, and includes a CBD cap and labelling/representation controls. | 10 mg/kg oil; 0.2 mg/kg beverages; 5 mg/kg other seed products; 75 mg/kg CBD cap | Supports treating processor specifications and testing as product-specific supply-chain issues. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/02-secondary-research/product-pathway-economic-rough-guide.md | Checked |
S075 - APVMA PubCRIS Dataset
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S075-001 | Data | PubCRIS host-use scan identified IH1 as industrial hemp and found registered-label pathways dominated by herbicides plus one fungicide seed treatment. | 316 host-use rows; 26 product codes; 23 current registered product records | Supports the finding that legal chemical pathways exist, but does not prove lower chemical use than alternatives. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/02-secondary-research/environmental-evidence.md | Checked |
| S075-002 | Claim | Some PubCRIS text matches for hemp are false matches because HEMP and HEMP1 refer to peppermint rather than industrial hemp. | False hemp matches identified | Supports data-quality caution when searching chemical records. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md | Checked |
S076 - APVMA Permits Database And Current Industrial Hemp Permit PDFs
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S076-001 | Claim | APVMA permit PDFs identify current permitted chemical pathways for selected herbicide, insecticide, fungicide and miticide uses in industrial hemp. | PER95564; PER86924; PER94780; PER94808 | Supports legal chemical-use pathway mapping but not environmental benefit claims. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/02-secondary-research/environmental-evidence.md | Checked |
| S076-002 | Claim | Several APVMA permit pathways are restricted by product type, production system, research status, human-consumption limits, grazing/feed limits, state exclusions, withholding periods or crop-safety cautions. | Fibre-only; protected-crop-only; research-only; non-human-consumption; non-grazing restrictions | Supports caution against broad claims that hemp uses fewer chemicals or has unrestricted chemical options. | docs/02-secondary-research/regulatory-and-definitional-scan.md; docs/02-secondary-research/environmental-evidence.md | Checked |
S103 - Hemp Harvests Submission
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S103-001 | Claim | Hemp Harvests submission identifies food, fibre, oil and export potential and practical barriers including digital advertising and feed restrictions. | Food; fibre; oil; export; advertising; feed restrictions | Provides market-validation leads and barrier themes but does not prove demand, prices or capacity. | docs/02-secondary-research/senate-inquiry-submissions.md; docs/02-secondary-research/supply-chain.md | Context only |
S104 - Food Frontier Submission
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S104-001 | Claim | Food Frontier identifies Hemp Harvests as a domestic hemp protein processing pathway involving protein concentrate, oil and hearts. | Hemp protein concentrate; oil; hearts | Supports primary validation of grain and seed-food pathways, but capacity and buying terms remain unverified. | docs/02-secondary-research/senate-inquiry-submissions.md; docs/02-secondary-research/supply-chain.md; docs/02-secondary-research/economic-confidence-review.md | Needs verification |
S106 - Mara Seeds Submission
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S106-001 | Data | Mara Seeds reports more than 15 years of commercial hemp growing and current annual hemp cropping of about 20 to 120 ha. | 15+ years; 20-120 ha/year | Provides comparable NSW operating evidence but not direct Granite Borders profitability. | docs/02-secondary-research/senate-inquiry-submissions.md; docs/02-secondary-research/supply-chain.md | Needs verification |
| S106-002 | Claim | Mara Seeds identifies suitable commercial planting seed as a practical constraint for Australian hemp expansion. | Commercial planting seed constraint | Supports treating planting seed and genetics as a specialist pathway and adoption constraint. | docs/02-secondary-research/senate-inquiry-submissions.md; docs/02-secondary-research/product-pathway-economic-rough-guide.md; docs/06-evidence/product-pathway-register.md | Needs verification |
S116 - Enterprise Profile - Hemp
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S116-001 | Data | Historic Tasmanian enterprise profile reported about 1 t/ha clean dried seed, about $3.50/kg price, about $2,210/ha variable costs and about $1,290/ha indicative gross margin. | 1 t/ha; $3.50/kg; $2,210/ha; $1,290/ha | Useful for budget structure and rough order-of-magnitude only; too old and Tasmania-specific for current Granite Borders economics. | docs/02-secondary-research/producer-economics.md; docs/02-secondary-research/economic-confidence-review.md; docs/02-secondary-research/product-pathway-economic-rough-guide.md | Context only |
S127 - Industrial Hemp For Building
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S127-001 | Claim | Australian Hemp Masonry Company states it works with Australian Hemp Fibre Processors Inc to source building-grade hurd from processors in NSW, Victoria, Tasmania and WA, with a Queensland/Northern Territory gap noted. | NSW; Victoria; Tasmania; WA; Qld/NT gap | Supports building-material pathway leads and processing-gap caution, but does not prove Granite Borders access or demand. | docs/02-secondary-research/supply-chain.md; docs/06-evidence/product-pathway-register.md | Needs verification |
S129 - AgriFutures Industry Case Study
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S129-001 | Claim | AgriFutures case-study article identifies X-Hemp's Tasmanian fibre facility and Wandarra/Hulkbuild/Hulkpack activity in Townsville across panels and packaging pathways. | Tasmania; Townsville | Supports panels, packaging and fibre/hurd pathway leads, but current capacity and offtake remain unverified. | docs/02-secondary-research/supply-chain.md; docs/06-evidence/product-pathway-register.md | Needs verification |
| S129-002 | Claim | AgriFutures article records co-product market and capital constraints around Australian fibre/hurd processing case studies. | Co-product markets; capital constraints | Supports caution that fibre/hurd economics depend on processing and co-product value capture. | docs/02-secondary-research/supply-chain.md; docs/02-secondary-research/product-pathway-economic-rough-guide.md | Context only |
S133 - Australian Industrial Hemp Best Management Practice Gap Analysis
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S133-001 | Data | AgriFutures 2023 gap analysis grain scenario uses 1.3 t/ha grain at $2,500/t and reports about $600/ha operating result, or about $750/ha if 3 t/ha straw is baled and sold. | 1.3 t/ha; $2,500/t; $600/ha; $750/ha; 3 t/ha straw | Provides the strongest current national budget scaffold for grain, but not local profitability. | docs/02-secondary-research/producer-economics.md; docs/02-secondary-research/product-pathway-economic-rough-guide.md; docs/02-secondary-research/economic-confidence-review.md | Checked |
| S133-002 | Data | AgriFutures 2023 gap analysis biomass and dual-purpose scenarios show weak Scenario 1 returns and stronger Scenario 2 returns where refined hurd/fibre/trash value is captured. | $46/ha; $1,426/ha; $135/ha; $1,855/ha | Supports separating farmgate baled biomass from refined-product value capture in later modelling. | docs/02-secondary-research/producer-economics.md; docs/02-secondary-research/product-pathway-economic-rough-guide.md; docs/04-analysis/phase-2-interim/synthesis.md | Checked |
S134 - Cost Your Hemp - Intro
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S134-001 | Claim | Australian Hemp Council Cost Your Hemp guidance identifies input costs to point of sale including soil preparation, seed, fertiliser and chemicals, water, harvesting, baling, drying, storage, freight, capital and opportunity costs. | Input costs to point of sale | Supports budget-question structure but does not provide verified Granite Borders cost figures. | docs/02-secondary-research/producer-economics.md; docs/02-secondary-research/product-pathway-economic-rough-guide.md; docs/02-secondary-research/economic-confidence-review.md | Checked |
S137 - Investigating The Potential Of Industrial Hemp As A Forage Crop
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S137-001 | Data | UTAS project page notes Tasmania produced about 80% of Australian hemp seed production and about 1,400 ha of hemp in 2018, and that growers could not make more than $2,000/ha gross margin where only seed was harvested and vegetative parts were unused or burnt. | 80%; 1,400 ha; $2,000/ha gross margin ceiling | Supports caution that whole-plant value capture can matter and seed-only economics may cap upside. | docs/02-secondary-research/economic-confidence-review.md; docs/02-secondary-research/product-pathway-economic-rough-guide.md | Context only |
S138 - AgriFutures Industrial Hemp Overview
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S138-001 | Claim | AgriFutures industrial hemp overview identifies broad applications including textiles, paper, rope, fuel, oil, stockfeed, building materials, cosmetics, pet food, food and personal care. | Product application list | Supports pathway completeness checking, not evidence that each pathway is viable in Granite Borders. | docs/06-evidence/product-pathway-register.md; docs/06-evidence/source-register.md | Context only |
| S138-002 | Claim | AgriFutures overview notes profitable industry development still requires scale, suitable varieties, agronomy, mechanisation, processing and established long-term markets. | Scale; varieties; agronomy; mechanisation; processing; markets | Reinforces the current project position that evidence-building and validation are needed before recommendation. | docs/02-secondary-research/economic-confidence-review.md; docs/06-evidence/product-pathway-register.md | Checked |
S139 - Agriculture Victoria Industrial Hemp Guidance
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S139-001 | Claim | Agriculture Victoria identifies non-therapeutic industrial hemp uses as food, cosmetics and fibre, and distinguishes seed for food or sowing, fibre, hurd and other crop purposes. | Food; cosmetics; fibre; seed for food or sowing; hurd; other | Supports product-pathway classification and the inclusion of cosmetics and planting seed as explicit pathways or validation leads. | docs/06-evidence/product-pathway-register.md | Checked |
| S139-002 | Claim | Agriculture Victoria cautions that hemp is currently not allowed as ordinary stockfeed in Australia. | Stockfeed not currently allowed as ordinary use | Supports excluding animal feed and pet food from commercial assumptions unless a lawful product-specific pathway is verified. | docs/06-evidence/product-pathway-register.md | Checked |
S140 - APVMA Cannabis In Veterinary Chemical Products
| Item ID | Type | Claim or data point | Value or threshold | Interpretation | Used in published pages | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S140-001 | Claim | APVMA guidance states animal or pet food products containing cannabis, hemp, hemp oil, hemp seed oil or cannabinoids must be registered if they meet the veterinary chemical product definition. | Registration required if veterinary chemical product definition is met | Supports animal feed and pet food exclusion unless a product-specific lawful pathway is verified. | docs/06-evidence/product-pathway-register.md; docs/06-evidence/source-register.md | Checked |
| S140-002 | Claim | APVMA guidance warns that unregistered veterinary chemical products attract civil and criminal penalties. | Civil and criminal penalties | Supports treating feed and pet-food pathways as regulatory risk areas, not ordinary co-product markets. | docs/06-evidence/product-pathway-register.md | Checked |